THE CONNECTION...

IN WHAT I ALLEGE IS A RIGGED STATE THAT WE ARE LIVING IN, AMONG MANY PERHAPS. THERE IS ALWAYS A THRU LINE TO CONNECT THE DOTS WHICH I DISCOVERED LAST FRIDAY, WHILE VISITING STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE AT 111 N HILL ST. RM 253, LA, CA 90012...WHO GOVERNS WHAT CITY, SUCH AS IN THE ANTELOPE VALLEY WHERE MY CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED, IN KERN COUNTY. MR. MICHAEL ANTONOVICH C/0 ANTELOPE VALLEY COURTHOUSE, 42011 4TH ST. WEST, LANCASTER, CA 93534 HAS CLAIMED THIS TERRITORY AS HIS OWN, AS I RECKON MR. STANLEY MOSK HAS DONE WITHOUT BEING ELECTED BY THE VOTERS, BUT ALAS, BY, "MERELY PRESUMING THE POSITION". ALSO, THE STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE BELONGS TO THE CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES. WHAT THE HECK DOES THAT MEAN? WHILE SEARCHING THROUGH THE STANLEY MOSK COMPUTER FILES I DISCOVERED THE NAME OF A CASE INVOLVING A PERSON WITH THE SAME NAME AS MY EX HUSBAND WHO IS A RESIDENT OF NEW YORK,:BUSSEY; CHARLES, (LEROY) A MIDDLE NAME SUBSTITUTED FOR "ARTHUR", THE MIDDLE NAME I KNEW HIM BY, CASE NO.3JM07213 09/02/2003 WEST COVINA, COURTHOUSE (CIT). WHAT IS STRIKINGLY INTERESTING ABOUT THIS IS, FIRST THE YEAR, 2003, WHICH IS THE YEAR THAT I HAD PURCHASED MY RENTAL IN CALIFORNIA CITY, CA 93505, WHICH IS ALSO THE YEAR THAT ALL MY RETIREMENT FUNDS WERE WIPED OUT BY TD WATERHOUSE, SEE SPECIFICS OF THIS IN AN EARLIER UNIQUE PERSPECTIVE BLOGS. IN ADDITION, THE CASE N0. INVOLVES THE INITIALS "JM" WHICH COULD STAND FOR JAMES MITCHELL, MY FATHER'S YOUNGEST BROTHER, WHO I ALLEGE MAY BE PART OF THE RUSE AT THAT TIME IN THE EARLY YEARS OF THE 20TH CENTURY, WHERE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES DECLARE WAR ON EACH OTHER, AND UNFORTUNATELY IT STILL EXISTS TODAY. YET I DO BELIEVE WILL SOON BE A THING OF THE PAST. CHARLES BUSSEY REPRESENTING CCNY AND JAMES MITCHELL REPRESENTING NYU, REMEMBER BOTH OF THESE SCHOOLS AT THE TIME WERE FREE, NO TUITION, I RECALL BEING TOLD BY MY UNCLE JAMES OF INGLEWOOD CLIFFS, NEW JERSEY. THESE UNIVERSITIES WERE GOVERNMENT SPONSORED SO-TO- SPEAK THERE HAD TO BE A MEANS OF THESE SO CALLED INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING BEING COMPENSATED, HENCE THE FORMATION OF WITNESS PROTECTION AND HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE PERHAPS WHERE EVERY ONE WAS ISSUED A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER BY THAT TIME. ONCE THIS WAS IN PLACE WAS WHEN THE DEVIANTS BEGAN "EATING THEIR OWN OFF SPRING" SO TO SPEAK. REMEMBER, GOVERNMENT CATERED TO MALES TO THE EXTEND THAT MUCH OLDER MEN WERE ABLE TO MARRY WAY YOUNGER WOMEN AND TAKE EVERYTHING THEY OWNED BY PIMPING THEM OUT THROUGH MARRIAGE, WHICH I ALLEGE, MY HUSBAND WAS ABLE TO DO WITH THE AID OF POLITICIANS AND RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS. EVEN THE LOCATION OF WHERE ONE DWELLED COULD OFFER A CLUE, SUCH AS "CONVENT AVENUE" IN HARLEM, COULD IT AT ONE TIME HAVE BEEN A CONVENT INHABITED BY THE VERY SAME INDIVIDUALS WHO WERE NOW WORKING FOR PRIVATE INDUSTRY? REMEMBER THE THREE MEN I HAD MENTIONED WHILE STAYING AT THE HILTON WHICH HAD BEEN THE TUDOR HOTEL NEXT DOOR TO A CATHOLIC CHURCH, AND THE THREE MALES DRESSED IN REGULAR ATTIRE AS THEY PASSED ME SAID APOLOGETICALLY, "I'M SORRY", FOR WHAT I HAD WONDERED. REMEMBER, THERE WAS A DOCUMENT THAT MY EX HUSBAND HAD TO GET SIGNED BY HIS MOTHER GIVING HER PERMISSION TO MARRY ME. I WAS SEVENTEEN, BECAUSE HE WAS NOT YET 21, THE LEGAL AGE OF MEN, WHILE FEMALES BECAME GROWN AT THE AGE OF 18. IN ADDITION I ATTEST THAT CHARLES ARTHUR BUSSEY JR WAS WELL IN HIS 30'S WHEN HE HAD MARRIED ME, AFTER RAPING ME AND MAKING ME PREGNANT BECAUSE MY INTENTIONS WERE NOT TO STAY HOME AND HAVE BABIES (MORE POTENTIAL MONEY MAKERS) AND BE A HOUSE WIFE, AN ATTITUDE WHICH WAS CONSIDERED A SACRILEGE AGAINST THE "HOLY STATE OF MATRIMONY". ALSO IT WAS PAYMENT TIME, FOR THE HIGHER INSTITUTIONS OF LEARNING IN LIEU OF THEIR FREE TUITION AND THAT WAS TO WATCH, AND LISTEN TO MY HUSBAND AND ME, MAKING CONTRIVANCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFLICT TO SEE HOW I HANDLED IT, WHICH WAS THE PURPOSE OF MY BEING INSTITUTIONALIZED, BEING RAPED BY MY HUSBAND, AND HIS BRINGING CERTAIN MALES TO OUR APARTMENT KNOWING FULL WELL THAT THERE WOULD BE SEXUAL ACTIVITY SUCH AS THE SO CALLED CZECHOSLOVAKIAN FREEDOM FIGHTER THAT HE HAD BROUGHT HOME FOR DINNER ALONG WITH HIS SON, WHILE LIVING ON COOPER STREET IN THE BRONX NEW YORK. WE HAD A VERY BRIEF AFFAIR, GETTING TOGETHER ONCE, HIS SON WAS NOT WITH HIM AT THE TIME. HOW CAN SOMEONE LIVING IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, MAKE A CLAIM ALLOWING THE PERSON TO SNATCH REAL ESTATE THAT DIDN'T BELONG TO THEM, THAT ACTUALLY BELONGED TO HIS EX WIFE, ME, WHEN HE NEVER PAID FOR THE REAL ESTATE OR TAXES, OR ANYTHING HAVING TO DO WITH THE REAL ESTATE, AND HIS EX WIFE, ME, LIVED IN CALIFORNIA WHERE I HAD PAID TAXES, NOT NEW YORK. HOW CAN MY EX HUSBAND HAVE A LEGITIMATE CLAIM? HE DOESN'T. THE CASE # 95C21752 ANOTHER CASE DATED 9/25/95 WHICH I UNFORTUNATELY DID NOT COPY ENOUGH INFORMATION YET WILL REVISIT WHEN I RETURN TO COURT. I DID DISCOVER WHEN I RETURNED YESTERDAY AND LOOKED UP THE CASE THAT BUSSEY,CHARLES,"LEROY" HAD BEEN CONVICTED WITH NO CONTEST ON 10/27/2003 (AGAIN, SAME YEAR 2003 WHEN I HAD PURCHASED MY RENTAL PROPERTY. ANTONOVICH ALSO HAS AN ADDRESS AT 1040 W AVENUE J, LANCASTER, CA 93534 AND I JUST DISCOVERED ANOTHER OBSCURE COURTHOUSE IN HOLLYWOOD, LOCATED AT 5925 HOLLYWOOD BLVD, LA, CA 90026, THEY MAY MEAN 90028, WE'LL SEE. WHO AND HOW ARE THESE SUPPOSED FACILITIES OF LAW ARE BEING RUN AND BY WHOM, OR, ARE THEY MERELY PART OF THE SMOKE AND MIRROR SCAMS GIVING AN ILLUSION OF CONFORMING TO LAW WHILE BREAKING EVERY RULE IN THE LAW BOOKS, CONSTITUTION, AND DECLARATION OF SO CALLED INDEPENDENCE WHICH THEY ABHOR. (C)COPYRIGHTED BY GWEN MITCHELL ON MONDAY, AT 2:30PM ON 6/13/16 AT WEST HOLLYWOOD LIBRARY 90069, USA.EDITED AT THE WEST HOLLYWOOD LIBRARY ON TUESDAY, 6/14/16 AT 5:14PM, 90069